Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 139 days older than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 1037U - 320 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
310
59.04761904761905%
Multi-Core
513
47.28110599078341%
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |