Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 35% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-6200 - 210 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |