Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3705 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 128 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €122.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |