Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3865 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 289 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €382.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |