Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 179 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-9700F - 134 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - €880.71 vs €1064.68
- Up to 15% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10920X - €6.72 vs €7.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.95/FPS
85%
Price, €
€1064.68
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,064.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8591 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
98%
Value, €/FPS
€6.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€880.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €880.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8591 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10920X | vs | Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |