Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1311 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - 120 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - €167.69 vs €388.55
- Up to 63% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - €1.40 vs €3.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €388.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €167.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |