Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 309 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - €82.15 vs €149.97
- Up to 49% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - €0.75 vs €1.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €149.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7264 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7264 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |