Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1160 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-9100T - 242 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - €202.51 vs €388.55
- Up to 52% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-9100T - €0.84 vs €1.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €388.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |