Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - €51.37 vs €168.30
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 7 5700X - €0.23 vs €0.70 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3900 - 239 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
224
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6951 minutes ago
Buy for €168.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6951 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |