Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €51.37 vs €392.14
- Up to 81% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-13700K - €0.33 vs €1.70 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 46% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 230 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8621 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
19%
Price, €
€392.14
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8621 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |