Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - €51.37 vs €110.27
- Up to 43% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 5600 - €0.24 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 262 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8682 minutes ago
Buy for €110.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8683 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |