Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €51.37 vs €70.23
- Up to 24% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.31 vs €0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8664 minutes ago
Buy for €70.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8664 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |