Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €40.17 vs €70.23
- Up to 42% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.19 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
211
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8667 minutes ago
Buy for €70.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8668 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |