Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €35.91 vs €82.15
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3400% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 93% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G1820 - €2.35 vs €35.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
43%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |