Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2531 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €40.17 vs €1014.81
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.16 vs €3.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron G1820 - 272 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
255
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6949 minutes ago
Buy for €1,014.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6949 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |