Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 3046 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 3 4100 - €40.17 vs €102.22
- Up to 57% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 3 4100 - €0.16 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1820 - 277 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
253
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8666 minutes ago
Buy for €102.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8666 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |