Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i3-10320 - 728 vs 723 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €199.5 vs €2439.63
- Up to 92% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - €0.28 vs €3.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
728
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.35/FPS
8%
Price, €
€2439.63
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,439.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
723
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |