Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €399.99 vs €579.7
- Up to 15% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €2.26 vs €2.65 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 24% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 219 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
177
80%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |