Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i9-10900 - 281 vs 280 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €433.4 vs €579.7
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €1.55 vs €2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11003 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€433.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €433.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |