Buy on Amazon
€71.48
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1896 days newer than Core i5-3470.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-3470 - 210 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
181
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.48
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470 Prozessor (3,2GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 77 Watt)
Buy for €71.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
