Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 236 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 529 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.604611443210935%
Multi-Core
1051
13.940840960339568%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
