Buy on Amazon
€311.42
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 252 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 2700 - 526 vs 524 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €261.39 vs €311.42
- Up to 15% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.5 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
84%
Price, €
€311.42
83%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €311.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
524
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.2GHz, 8 Kerne, Socket AM4) YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
