Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €183.01 vs €288.1
- Up to 30% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-11700F - €0.85 vs €1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 236 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
69%
Price, €
€288.1
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |