Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 703 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E-2176M - 564 vs 556 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2018 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
