Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 369 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |