Buy on Amazon
€299.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 45 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 4900H - 124 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900H - 20 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €299.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 9 4900H
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
