Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 530 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 259 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900H - 24 vs 16 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
255
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |