Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 230 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €399.99 vs €579.7
- Up to 29% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €1.79 vs €2.52 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11670 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
224
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |