Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10300 - 404 vs 386 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - €202.92 vs €225.18
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900X - €0.53 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €225.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2379 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
386
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |