Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i3-10300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €93.8 vs €277.13
- Up to 66% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-10700F - €0.7 vs €2.05 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10300 - 135 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.05/FPS
34%
Price, €
€277.13
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €277.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |