Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 917 days newer than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U - 192 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U - 20 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€295.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €295.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge PRO | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |