Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 826 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G4900 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.03981797497156%
Multi-Core
1051
12.39240655583068%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
