Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 1785 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €53.43 vs €121.54
- Up to 49% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - €0.43 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
51%
Price, €
€121.54
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
125
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |