Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 675 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €81.96 vs €180.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.39 vs €0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11988 minutes ago
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11988 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |