Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €45.0 vs €540.57
- Up to 90% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900KF - €0.26 vs €2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 1600X - 203 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
9%
Price, €
€540.57
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €540.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |