Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4767 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-860 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €45.78 vs €495.9
- Up to 89% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - €0.24 vs €2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
11%
Price, €
€495.9
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €495.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |