Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2380 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €191.69 vs €578.96
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900K - €1.06 vs €2.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 225 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.57/FPS
41%
Price, €
€578.96
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €578.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |