Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 33% better in War Thunder than Core i5-11600 - 300 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €124.22 vs €535.16
- Up to 69% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-14900K - €0.55 vs €1.78 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
30%
Price, €
€535.16
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €535.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7425 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €124.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |