Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 213 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 30% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 181 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 20 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€281.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €281.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
65.75178997613365%
Multi-Core
3078
36.5297887491099%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |