Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4300U is 858 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 262 vs 259 FPS
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Renoir | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |