Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 4% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-6300 - 284 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €52.95 vs €261.39
- Up to 79% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 3 3300X - €0.19 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
284
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
20%
Price, €
€261.39
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
274
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |