Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 924 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 15 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3250U - 194 vs 163 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 112 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |