Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 107 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Ryzen 3 3200U - 174 vs 166 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
