Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €65.93 vs €309.6
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 120 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €65.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Buy for €309.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
49.57587181903864%
Multi-Core
3013
36.79775280898877%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |