Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 817 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €65.93 vs €66.58
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 161 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €65.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
Buy for €66.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
98.50187265917603%
Multi-Core
3013
65.81476627348188%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |