Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 12% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €73.57 vs €191.69
- Up to 58% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.47 vs €1.11 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |