Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6300 - 108 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - €49.68 vs €74.07
- Up to 28% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - €0.5 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14031 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |