Buy on Amazon
€89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 598 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €89.0 vs €314.9
- Up to 69% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-10900F - €0.45 vs €1.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 3 2300X - 215 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 20 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X 3.5GHz Tray
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12515 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
30%
Price, €
€314.9
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
