Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4417 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Phenom X4 9650 - 260 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €291.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.200477326968974%
Multi-Core
765
9.079041063375266%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |