Buy on Amazon
€216.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4417 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Phenom X4 9650 - 227 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
15.464587394411955%
Multi-Core
765
16.536964980544745%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
